Skip to main content
Enabling teams to work better together

Category: Communication

Illuminate your message with a clear spotlight, not a messy floodlight

Knowledge worker blinded by communication glare


“Too little information and you’re blind, too much and you’re blinded.”

This line from Stuart Turton’s debut novel, The Seven Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle, caught my eye.

For me – someone who designs, delivers, and deciphers messages for a living – these 11 words highlight why communication can often be ineffective. 

 

The quest for understanding is sometimes described as seeking enlightenment: what should we do and why? But the light that illuminates our message can be too dim or too dazzling to help.

As communicators, we need to think like lighting designers to control the intensity, direction, and focus of the message. That’s how we ensure each one achieves laser-like cut through, not a limp lamp glow or stadium-level glare.

Here’s how I see it happening.

Blinded by Too Much Light

When light intensifies into an all-consuming white-out, you literally cannot make out anything in front of you.

It’s the “Stage Light Effect.” The lights illuminate the presenter (sender), but simultaneously blind them to the audience’s faces. You’re sending a powerful message, but you’re blind to whether anyone can actually see it.

It’s also a relentless daily reality emanating from inboxes. With 251,100,000 emails, 18,800,000 texts and 1,040,000 Slack messages sent in an internet minute last year (according to Statista), every message risks becoming white noise.

And the meeting that should have been a memo? You walked in seeking clarity and walked out with a cognitive migraine, incapable of focusing on the single action item. Now your attention span is completely fried.

The “Squinting Reflex” is a common response. Squinting is a physical reaction meant to filter excessive light so your focus narrows. When you’re mentally squinting at a complex report or a dense email chain, however, you might actually sacrifice the big picture.

It’s an exhausting, protective posture that, if held for too long, leads to decision paralysis. You cannot confidently discern which ideas go where and what actions to prioritise. Just as Nobel laureate Herbert A. Simon warned:

“A wealth of information creates a poverty of attention.”

Blind Because of Too Little Light

Recognise this feeling? You open an email or Teams chat but you can’t see it properly. The message detail is so sparse, so devoid of context, that you’re left fumbling to figure out the meaning and expectations. It’s frustrating. And sometimes a little scary.

Like the meeting invitation that says, “Project discussion”. Which project? What should you prepare? What’s at stake? It’s like the sender has handed you a matchbook, dropped you into a cavern, and expected you to find the treasure. Not unlike “Murder in the Dark” (which happens a lot in Turton’s plot).

According to Atlassian, knowledge workers spend roughly 23.5% of their work week (about 10 hours) searching through emails and messaging channels for key information that should have been clear upfront.

Then there’s the “Shadow of Suspicion” that lurks when you’re already feeling low. Are the details deliberately withheld? Why are you getting the edited version? Are you being set up to fail? Have you been pushed out of the illuminated circle of trust?

You can’t follow the correct path because the information offers insufficient light for navigation. And we all know that mistakes made in the dark usually look worse under harsh office lighting.

(Remember the shock when the lights came back on at the end of the high school disco? 😱)

Don’t be that sender. Be the communicator who thinks like a lighting designer, projecting the right light (context, details) to create a clear, visible path to meaning and action.

Engineering the Light

The wisdom of Turton’s phrase illuminates why it’s important to set sufficient light where needed, to highlight the necessary details without causing sensory overload. After all, when faced with blinding information, your audience can’t just slip on their sunglasses.

Just like most won’t be wearing a headlamp or have a torch handy when your words fail to shine a light where they should.

The best lighting designers don’t just turn lights on and off; they control intensity, direction, and focus to guide the audience’s eye exactly where it needs to go.

Here’s how to illuminate without blinding

1. Set the Intensity

Before your audience can process any information, they need to know why they should care. This single question acts as your dimmer switch, adjusting the brightness to match what your specific audience needs to see. State the “why” in your opening line, don’t bury it in paragraph 3.

Communication isn’t just about shedding light on information; it’s about managing the exposure.

2. Direct the Beam

Think spotlight, not floodlight. A spotlight illuminates one actor on stage. A floodlight washes everything in uniform brightness, so nothing stands out. By controlling the direction, a clear spotlight illuminates only the action item or critical insight, whereas a broad, messy floodlight wastes energy and obscures the view.

You trigger a floodlight by trying to put too much into one message. If you can’t state your message’s single purpose in 5 words or fewer, you’re floodlighting, not spotlighting.

Controlling the beam is what distinguishes the effect of blinding people from truly enlightening them.

3. Filter the Beam.

It’s risky to assume that relevance is obvious to your reader or listener. The finance team doesn’t need to know about your product roadmap, for example, unless you explicitly connect it to budget implications. Before you hit send, ask yourself: If my recipient only reads 2 sentences of this, what must those 2 sentences be? Now put those sentences at the very top.

And before you copy the whole department, ask yourself if the information is essential for everyone or just nice-to-know? What’s your true motivation for the CCs and BCCs?

4. Create Contrast.

Use the shadows of other objects to define form – bold type, bullet points and white space help to highlight and prioritise the key elements of a long or complex message. Recognise that the reader’s attention is a finite resource – communication should be designed not just to transmit facts, but to guide them to the most important elements. Make it easy on the eyes and your reader will thank you.

The difference between feeling blind and being blinded is the difference between operating in ignorance and being knocked out by knowledge. Give your audience enough light to see the path forward, but not so much they can’t open their eyes.

Stuart Turton’s protagonist learned this the hard way. The Seven Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle is not a light read – it’s Groundhog Day and The Good Place meets Agatha Christie at Poe’s House of Usher. You might need an oil lamp.

 

If you’d like to become a more confident communicator, book a complimentary, unconditional  Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Book a Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Tap back to Communisence for more practical tips

How do communication bridges enhance ethical research?

Researchers are well-versed in the ethical principles governing their work, including informed consent, data privacy, and the integrity of scientific inquiry.

The ethical landscape, however, extends beyond the lab or field to encompass how researchers share their findings with the world.

Here are some practical ‘bridges’ for connecting with stakeholders, which reflect the key principles of ethical research communication.

Key principles of ethical communication

But first, what does ethical communication look like?

  • Recognises diverse cultural protocols and languages
  • Encourages 2-way communication and shared decision-making
  • Respects cultural knowledge and intellectual property
  • Commits to privacy and informed consent
  • Deals with power dynamics
  • Identifies and removes bias
  • Navigates language barriers
  • Narrows knowledge gaps
  • Crosses generational divides
  • Fills emotional voids sensitively
  • Overcomes technological inequity
  • Builds and maintains trust

We’ll explore some of these characteristics further on.

Communication bridges

A communication bridge is a deliberate effort to make information flow a two-way process.

Communication bridges shape messages in various formats to overcome barriers to sharing meaning. Like literal bridges, they connect two points that would otherwise be separate.

For research in particular, they serve to translate complex concepts (without condescension) into terms that different types of audiences can grasp.

They help move a conversation from dry facts and figures to a point of understanding and shared purpose.

Communication bridges can connect writers with readers (and presenters with audiences) through:

  • Language choices
  • Knowledge familiarity
  • Cultural considerations
  • Generational awareness
  • Emotional engagement
  • Technology range

Now let’s connect these concepts of communication bridges and ethical research.

Ethical research communication bridges

Here are 9 ways you can use communication bridges to extend the reach, understanding and trust in your research:

1. Preference Plain Language to make the science easier to understand.

2. Use precise language to avoid misleading your readers/audiences.

3. Prioritise the key points so your readers/audiences don’t get lost in the details

4. Respect the humanity of research participants by using “person-first” language, not scientific terms.

5. Acknowledge limitations to protect audiences from making decisions based on incomplete information.

6. Slow the “spin” to manage expectations, discourage sugar-coating, and counter sensationalism.

7. Contextualise findings to show how the research fits in with what is already known and what is still unknown, optimising the force of familiarity.

8. Engage respectfully with diverse perspectives, being open to feedback and constructive dialogue.

9. Vary technology choices, opting for the platforms and channels your readers/audiences prefer.

Addressing power dynamics ethically

Power dynamics affect the trust your readers/audiences have in your communication bridges – how messages are framed, worded, and delivered.

Their perception of your credibility as an expert, especially if they hold scientists in high regard, can influence whether they accept and interpret your messages favourably. It’s a position of power that’s tempting to exploit.

Sometimes your audience has a stronger position of power such as funders and policy designers, which can influence your communication choices.

Conscious communication choices help you manage power dynamics, such as:

  • Consulting stakeholders throughout (not just at the start or end) of a project
  • Genuinely inviting and considering feedback
  • Ensuring research findings are accessible to all stakeholders
  • Acknowledging past mistakes or inept methods
  • Using inclusive language
  • Adapting communication styles
  • Striving for equitable representation in research teams and communication materials

Tactics for managing bias risks

As with other communication scenarios, the risk of bias influencing messages and responses can be high.

Universal types of bias that can emerge include:

  • Personal
  • Similarity
  • Curse of knowledge
  • False consensus
  • Courtesy
  • Cultural
  • Narrative fallacy
  • Language
  • Social desirability
  • Groupthink/herd mentality

When you are trying to effect significant change through your research (e.g. in policy, behaviour, resource allocation), highlighting bias is a common way for others to suspect or undermine your efforts.

Check your communication before it goes public with these 7 tactics:

1. Use neutral language that doesn’t reinforce outdated stereotypes

2. Seek community input about preferred terminology, technology, location, etc.

3. Compare multiple perspectives as well as data when validating research findings.  

4. Corroborate findings with members of the communities that the data represents before you share it widely.

5. Ask colleagues to identify and address potential biases during peer reviews.  

6. Include collaborators from different backgrounds to bring more perspective variety to the research process.  

7. Clearly state any potential biases or limitations in research reports and communication materials.

Ethical communication is a researcher’s professional responsibility. It ensures their work is presented in ways that reflect the common elements of ethics: respect, honesty and truth, transparency and openness, accuracy, integrity and fairness.

It’s the key to establishing and maintaining trust so that stakeholders can be confident about the value of research outcomes for decision-making and societal benefits.

If you’d like more practical tips on ethical research communication, request a free resource via email to service@presencecommunications.com.au.

And if you’d like to become a more confident communicator, whether or not research is your remit, book a complimentary, unconditional  Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Book a Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Tap back to Communisence for more practical tips

“Good at English” doesn’t always mean “good at communicating”

 

So, you were “good at English” in high school.

Does that make a difference to your paycheck now, no matter what industry or occupation you’re currently in? 

It’s a question most people never consider. But the truth is, the literacy skills you took for granted in the classroom are the very ones that decide your career trajectory.

So, the answer is yes.

 

Literacy helped you gain all the other knowledge and skills you’ve needed to get to where you are today. But literacy skills alone only get you so far.

Why being “literate” isn’t enough anymore

It’s communication – your ability to interpret, apply, and refine foundational literacy skills to real-world business situations – that enables you to perform at your peak.

And to become a “communication shapeshifter”: writing a technical document that a non-expert can understand, then crafting an executive summary that grabs attention in a single glance, followed by presenting a case online where every word must be compelling… all before lunchtime!

That’s why professionals who level up their literacy skills to hone communication competence don’t just get by; they get ahead.

Strong communication skills are consistently ranked by employers as a critical capability. A recent Jobs and Skills Australia report highlighted the “communicate and collaborate” skills cluster as likely to see the largest growth across all occupations.

The smartest investment you can make isn’t in crypto or real estate; it’s in your own ability to communicate like the leader you want to become. And strong literacy is the foundation that primes and positions you for the role.

Why ongoing literacy development matters

Today – International Literacy Day – is not just some feel-good educational initiative.

Business success depends on it, too. According to Ai Group’s Counting the cost: Addressing the impact of low levels of literacy and numeracy in the workplace report, a staggering 88% of Australian businesses are affected by low levels of literacy and numeracy. Poor completion of workplace documents, time wastage, and a lack of staff confidence and willingness to take on new work are just some of the impacts.

The leap from literacy to communication closes the aspiration gap between being heard and being ignored, between leading meetings and sitting silently, between writing your own ticket and watching others write theirs.

When you can express your thoughts clearly in writing, you project competence and attention to detail. When you speak with precision and clarity, you command attention and respect. The power combo of literacy and communication enables you to choose the right words, structure your thoughts logically, and adapt your communication style to different audiences.

Today, think about and thank the grown-ups in your early years who insisted that you develop strong literacy skills.

And if you want to take them to the next level, so you can communicate more confidently and effectively, let’s talk about how I can help you.

Book a complimentary, unconditional  Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Book a Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Tap back to Communisence for more practical tips

Communication is a survival skill

no permission to use elsewhere

It’s National Skills Week in Australia (25-31 August).

But you know what the most important skillset is, no matter what your vocation, trade or profession?

Communication.

That’s why the entrepreneurship program I deliver as a TAFE Queensland business mentor and third party provider focuses on articulating the value of an enterprise so potential clients and customers are motivated to buy.

It’s also why the professional writing and editing qualifications I teach through Linden College’s Creative Business Academy are in demand – even the best, most innovative or game-changing ideas have no impact if their value is not understood by the people who will benefit.

Communication capability is not an innate trait or talent. Just like physical ones, our metaphorical communication muscles can be strengthened and flexed through intentional development and consistent practice.

It’s one of the first skills we honed as newborns. It’s how we learned to have our needs met and our trust and gratitude recognised so we could develop all our other abilities. We wouldn’t have survived otherwise.

Let’s be done with this notion of communication as a ‘soft skill’. It’s a survival skill!

And not just for individuals.

  • In Grammarly’s 2023 State of Business Communication Report with The Harris Poll, 1 in 5 leaders said they’d lost deals due to poor communication, and 68% of those leaders indicated the deals lost cost them $10K or more.
  • Pumble’s 2025 workplace communication report highlighted that 86% of employees and executives cite inefficient and ineffective communication as the main cause of workplace failure.

Like all survival skills, communication involves adapting to the environment: the threats, opportunities, available resources, allies and adversaries.

You made it through toddler tantrums, schoolyard scraps, classroom collaborations, long boring lectures, and wtf workplace wobbles.

Take a moment this week to reflect on the valuable, value-adding communication skills that have helped you get to where you are today (stars, scars and stumbles included!).

But if you feel your business communication skills could use some help, book a complimentary, unconditional  Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Book a Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Tap back to Communisence for more practical tips

Ask a Mate gives voice to a silent struggle

Have you ever felt really awkward about asking for advice, because you didn’t want anyone to think there was something wrong with your brain or your body or character?

Double down on that decision discomfort and you’ll know what it’s like to be a teenage boy.

The transition from boyhood through adolescence is a complex landscape, marked by rapid physical, emotional, and social changes. Navigating this terrain can be challenging, especially the societal expectations around masculinity that can inadvertently silence their voices and hinder their ability or willingness to seek and discern helpful advice.

This Domestic and Family Violence Awareness Month, let’s try to understand how these communication struggles at a critical developmental stage often contribute to harmful behaviours later in life… or could be helped from now on.

What do we know about teenage boys’ communication?

Research consistently highlights the difficulties boys face in expressing their emotions and vulnerabilities. Traditional masculine norms often discourage displays of feelings other than aggression, so boys tend to internalise stress, confusion, and hurt.

Youth mental health clinicians in Victoria published a study in the Journal of Adolescent Health, which found that boys are less likely than girls to seek help for mental health concerns, often due to fears of appearing weak or unmanly.

The research also found that many adolescent boys and young adult men “report difficulties in emotion-based disclosures typically demanded by standard talk-based psychotherapies”. Such reluctance or inability to communicate openly can have significant impacts on their well-being, relationships, and their confidence to deal with conflict, fears or abuse.  

The pervasive “tough guy” stereotype perpetuated by movies and social media often equates emotional expression with weakness, pushing boys towards stoicism and self-reliance, even when they desperately need support.

They might hear phrases like “man up” or “only babies cry,” which subtly but powerfully discourage them from articulating their fears, anxieties, or experiences of being hurt.

The role of 24/7 technology

The digital age presents a double-edged sword. While creating connections, it also exposes boys to a barrage of often contradictory and sometimes harmful advice.

The Journal of Adolescent Health article referenced previous studies which indicated young men prefer to access help through technology-based mediums. However, discerning credible and healthy advice from misinformation online is a significant hurdle for many young minds still developing their critical thinking skills.

Social media influencers, online communities, and even well-intentioned but misinformed peers can offer guidance that is not only unhelpful but actively detrimental, particularly about relationships, conflict resolution, and emotional regulation.

Australia’s eSafety Commissioner published a report on the online behaviours and experiences of our first digital native generation of teens. While the research didn’t find significant differences between genders, the report did reveal that boys are less inclined to:

  • make “face contact” via video or image-sharing apps
  • ask a parent/carer for online safety advice
  • want information about counselling services
  • obtain consent before sharing photos or details about people online
  • stand up for others who are bullied online

No voice to avoid violence

University of the Sunshine Coast researchers investigating adolescents’ help-seeking intentions found that while there’s no gender difference in the intentions, “More female adolescents sought help for a psychosocial problem compared to male adolescents, but more male adolescents were observed to have experienced a psychosocial problem compared to female adolescents.”

To me, this speaks of a silent struggle to take that scary step from wanting and needing help to actually seeking it.

The consequences of these communication barriers are far-reaching. Boys who struggle to express their emotions may resort to unhealthy coping mechanisms, including aggression or withdrawal. They might find it difficult to build healthy, respectful relationships based on open communication and mutual understanding.

In the context of domestic and family violence, this silence can be particularly dangerous. Boys who are experiencing or witnessing abuse may feel unable to speak out, and those struggling with anger or controlling behaviours may lack the communication skills to address these feelings constructively.

An innovative app(roach) has arrived

Against this backdrop, Beyond DV’s new “Ask a Mate” app has emerged as the sound of hope. Responding to the communication preferences of adolescent boys, this app offers a safe, accessible, and peer-focused platform where they can seek guidance on a whole range of issues.

The charity’s founder, Carolyn Robinson, surveyed boys at different high schools to gather hundreds of questions about what concerned them. They also suggested high-profile male role models they’d like to hear the answers from.

The “Ask a Mate” app cleverly leverages the power of peer support and digital connection, but with access to vetted information and pathways to professional help when needed.

It’s a space where boys-becoming-men feel comfortable asking questions without fear of judgment. It breaks down the stigma around seeking support and empowers them to develop healthier communication habits.

It acknowledges that boys often turn to their mates first, and seeks to equip those mates with the resources and information to offer helpful and sound advice.

Importantly, this collaborative “Ask a Mate” initiative recognises that changing deeply ingrained societal norms takes time and multifaceted solutions. By meeting boys where they are – in their digital spaces and within their peer networks – the “Ask a Mate” app offers a practical tool to open up communication, promote healthy relationship behaviours, and ultimately contribute to a safer community for everyone.

During Domestic and Family Violence Awareness Month, let’s amplify the effect by sharing its existence with your sons, grandsons, younger brothers, nephews, neighbours and mates.

This post is about personal communication. If you feel your business communication skills could use some help, book a complimentary, unconditional  Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Book a Communication Coaching Clarity Call

Tap back to Communisence for more practical tips